Archive for the 'Myths' Category

Are Imperial units based on 12s?

Thursday, May 22nd, 2008

It is often claimed that imperial is based on 12s (duodecimal) and that this has advantages over decimal. But is this truth or myth? (more…)

First Emperor showed the way - 2000 years ago

Saturday, April 12th, 2008

I recently had the pleasure of visiting the splendid (Chinese) First Emperor exhibition at the British Museum. Apart from the terracotta warriors, what impressed me the most was the way that Qin Shihuangdi imposed standardisation on his vast empire - including, of course, weights and measures.

(more…)

Language and measurement - an enduring relationship

Friday, February 1st, 2008

One objection to metrication that I often hear is that the imperial system is embedded in the English language. If we were to lose the old measurement system, we would lose a lot of our language with it, they say. Just how true is that? (Article contributed by David Brown)

(more…)

Are imperial feet “natural” units ?

Tuesday, January 1st, 2008

With the slow transition to metric in the UK, a lot of myths have emerged regarding metric and imperial. With a New Year it is an appropriate time to examine some of these myths starting with the claim that imperial feet are ‘natural’ units. (more…)

Are imperial units “natural”? (and some useful rules of thumb)

Sunday, October 28th, 2007

One of the claims sometimes made by defenders of imperial weights and measures is that they are “natural”. The metric system (they may say) is all very well for science and technical matters, but for everyday life imperial units like the foot conform to the human scale and are more natural – unlike the arbitrary metric unit, the metre. We examine this argument.

(more…)